creative industries fund nl
Selected projects from the Open Call: Urban planning for extremes

Selected projects from the Open Call: Urban planning for extremes

15 June 2017

If nothing changes then cities will be faced with flooding several times a year because of extreme precipitation alternating with longer periods of extreme dryness and heat. Mobilizing the power of design and connecting the climate adaptation issue with cultural heritage structures provides a means of facilitating the development of surprising new insights and trains of thought. In March 2017 the Fund called on designers, local governments, cultural historians, executive parties and engineers to submit concrete proposals. Four proposals were selected.
With the Open Call: Urban planning for extremes (in Dutch only) the Fund invited the submission of concrete proposals for an integral approach to the climate issue in relation to the sustainable development of existing cultural heritage structures in urban contexts. The involvement of an inquiring or commissioning party such as a municipal or provincial council, land developer or water board was a requirement. This open call attracted 13 project proposals.

evaluation and selection
The submitted proposals were presented to three advisers for their expert advice: Daan Zandbelt (architect / urban planner, Government Adviser for the Physical Environment (CRa), partner in De Zwarte Hond, associated with Van Eesteren Chair for Regional Design at TU Delft), Hanneke Kijne (landscape architect, partner in bureau HOSPER, coordinator for Professional Experience Programme (PEP), member of the City of Utrecht’s Committee for Aesthetic Control and Monuments) and Ellen Vreenegoor (archaeologist, VER programme director for Water and Heritage at the RCE). They evaluated the proposals with regard to formulation of the assignment, action plan, the pool of expertise involved and overall coherence. After two rounds of evaluation the panel arrived at a shortlist of four proposals that it preferred above the other submissions:

Resilient Weert
Personal Architecture, NOHNIK, historian Lara Voerman and Weert Municipal Council
Cultural heritage as a vehicle for an attractive climate-adaptive city
Arconiko architects, Designlab 2902, Water Sensitive Rotterdam, historian Hilde Sennema, Vereniging RCD, the Hoogheemraadschap Rijnland district water control board and Rotterdam City Council
The Island of Dordrecht: transformation of regional water defences into an adaptation landscape
Felixx, UNESCO-IHE and Dordrecht City Council
The inner perimeter canal as a climate-adaptive vehicle for the historical city centre
OKRA, Alterra, WUR, Stichting in Arcadië, Climate KIC and Utrecht City Council

All four of the selected proposals proceed from an area-focused approach to heritage, with the underlying culture-historical structures, visible qualities and valuable local identities serving as the basis for developing relevant solutions for urban climate-adaptation tasks. They are aimed at diverse spatial typologies and scales. Weerbaar Weert (Resilient Weert) is an investigation into climate-adaptive interventions to give a qualitative impulse to the city centre, while Arconiko architects wants to devise a climate adaptation strategy for a metropolitan location in central Rotterdam based on pre-existing structural layers in conjunction with partners. The Island of Dordrecht is a proposal for a spatial development strategy for a newly enlivened adaptation landscape, which involves secondary regional water defences being imbued with fresh significance. Proceeding from a Utrecht case study, the fourth project focuses on the singel – the perimeter canal around the old city – as a climate-adaptive vehicle for historical city centres.

overall impression
The advisers thought that the formulated assignment in the triangle of heritage, climate and city was highly relevant and interesting, as public-sector commissioners devote relatively little attention to it. By and large they were positive about the quality and diversity of the submitted proposals. With cases in Limburg, Utrecht, North and South Holland these were very diverse in their set-up, and municipal and provincial councils, water boards and other stakeholders such as knowledge institutions were in general well-integrated or actually involved with the proposals as authors.

the next Open Call
A second open call within this theme will be issued in the autumn of 2017. Keep an eye on Creative Industries Fund NL’s website or subscribe to the newsletter.

Heritage and Spatial Planning Programme
In March 2017, Creative Industries Fund NL launched the new Heritage and Spatial Planning Programme, which it will be implementing over two years in association with the Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands (Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed or RCE) in the context of the Vision for Heritage and Spatial Planning Erfgoed en Ruimte or VER) (in Dutch only). This design programme interconnects urgent social issues and topical questions in the realm of heritage and space. Pivotal to this is a region-specific approach to heritage. Within this programme, two open calls were issued simultaneously. The Open Call: New Energy for the Landscape (in Dutch only) concentrated on the theme of energy transition in the landscape, while the Open Call: Urban Planning for Extremes (in Dutch only) focused on adapting to climate change in the city.

more news


Documentary 'Cosmogonia Mundi' by MAKE MOVE THINK

20 July 2018

Cosmogonia Mundi reflects on the possible futures of the City of Venice and the Port of Marghera in the form of live dance, using Northscapes Collective’s installation The Port and the Fall of Icarus on the shore of the laguna as a backdrop, and a film documentary in the main exhibition of the Venice Pavilion/Marghera.
In this project, which is part of a larger research programme, MAKE MOVE THINK explores the dialogue between individualism and collectivism in contemporary urban culture. Performing Arts and Architecture meld to create a moment where Dance is not merely performance and Architecture is not permanence.
Below a short documentary created as part of the project 'Cosmogonia Mundi' at the Venice Architecture Biennale.

Documentaire 'A School in the Making' door Case Design

19 July 2018

The exhibition a School in the Making presents the ongoing experience of building the Avasara Academy in India. It shares the story of the formation of the school as a collaborative and experimental practice. The exhibition is built up as a collection of material and artefacts that are partly produced in India and partly in Italy.
Case Design develops and produces all the items with a collaborative effort and in the spirit of a workshop with several contributores. By sharing these stories, Case Design depicts the process of making a school by showing the work that has already been done, but more importantly by creating new ideas that will eventually return to the campus and students for which they are imagined.

Below a short documentary created as part of the installation at the Venice Architecture Biennale.

Podcastseries with participants of the Venice Architecture Biënnale 2018

17 July 2018

This series of dialogues explores the multi-faceted effects of automation processes on the organisation of work, the freedom of bodies and the nature of the spaces they inhabit. Recorded during the opening days of WORK, BODY, LEISURE in the Dutch pavilion at the Venice Architecture Biennale in 2018. By René Boer (Failed Architecture) and Arif Kornweitz (Ja Ja Ja Nee Nee Nee).
One of the premises of the debates around the impact of automation is that these processes render (non)-human bodies and spaces obsolete. Yet automation processes may also revitalise those entities or create new ones. In unscripted gatherings that infiltrated the Dutch Pavilion during the Biennale’s opening days, René Boer and Arif Kornweitz explored these questions together with participants and guests. The conversations, recorded and available as a podcast series on the websites of Het Nieuwe Instituut, Creative Industries Fund NL and Ja Ja Ja Nee Nee Nee, capture the energy, dynamism and wealth of ideas circulating during the opening days of the Dutch Pavilion.
1. A conversation with Hamed Khosravi, Taneha Kuzniecow Bacchin and Filippo LaFleur over toekomstscenario's voor een slimme en intelligente haven:

‘The Port and the Fall of Icarus’ by Northscapes Collective (Hamed Khosravi, Taneha Kuzniecow Bacchin, Filippo LaFleur). Photo: Daria Scagliola
2. A conversation between curator Arif Kornweitz, architect Liam Young and designer and researcher Simone Niquille about digital bodies & spaces:

The installation 'Renderlands' by Liam Young in the Dutch Pavilion. Photo: Daria Scagliola
3. Architect René Boer speaks with Giuditta Vendrame and artist Giulio Squillacciotti, initiators of the project 'Shore Leaves':

'Shore Leaves' by Giuditta Vendrame, Paolo Patelli & Giulio Squillacciotti.

Photo above: Ja Ja Ja Nee Nee Nee during the previewdays Venice Architecture Biënnale in the Dutch Pavilion with the theme WORK, BODY, LEISURE. Photo: Daria Scagliola.


What about FREESPACE - Reporting from the Biennale

17 July 2018

On Thursday July 5th, Het Nieuwe Instituut and the Creative Industries Fund NL presented an evening of contributions to the Venice Biennale of 2018. The evening completed a nearly year-long series of lectures, debates, open calls and discussions on the Biennale and its theme FREESPACE. The cycle of events opened with lectures on the Fund’s open call ‘Work, Body, Leisure’ during the Dutch Design Week in October 2017. In the end, the wide range of lectures, workshops, publications and contributions to the Venice Biennale encouraged an ongoing conversation on the societal impact of architecture, design and the creative industries.
Text by Lara Schrijver

sensory experiences
This year’s Biennale presented a broad palette of sensory experiences, from imagery that draws in the spectator to installations with a highly material articulation. Most of the objects triggered an immediate visceral response, more direct and compelling than the intellectual framework for each installation. Notwithstanding the thorough and clearly delineated intentions of the curators, the sensory took primacy over all other approaches. Engaging and provocative, it could be tempting to approach this Biennale as a purely aesthetic experience, which therefore disengages from societal and political challenges currently facing the world. After all, if it is aimed at the senses, how could it possibly provide a critical view to society?

Yet nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the proposition of Grafton Architects in FREESPACE seeks to connect people to their environment in a more coherent way. It suggests that the challenges are more easily faced if the environment is amenable to fostering observational skills, connections and a sense of generosity. More than that, though, it allows its observers to seek their own questions and draw their own conclusions. These spaces give rise to an affinity that draws in observers, provokes them to explore further, and thus allows new perspectives to appear.

multiple perspectives on FREESPACE
This undercurrent is what drew the evening’s participants together. Each contribution provided its own distinctive approach to the material, performative, and social interpretation of FREESPACE, from a film registration of a dance performance to a study of Irish marketplaces as a model for understanding social cohesion. The multiple perspectives provided a springboard for addressing the issues put forward in the curatorial statements on FREESPACE, shaping the conversation throughout the evening. While the discussion remained necessarily brief after six presentations, shared questions for the future could be traced through the program: how might architecture and design help to address or even reposition societal challenges? How may design proposals reveal hidden social mechanisms? How may our built environment challenge our preconceptions, or indeed foster unforeseen connections?

‘What is it that brings us together, what are the connections that run throughout people, places, and cities?’

After a brief introduction highlighting the collaborative efforts of the Fund and Het Nieuwe Instituut, the main program began with a 10-minute film by Make Move Think, which compiled the ideas and registration of a dance event held during opening weekend: a dancer on a quay, shards of poetry in the background and the occasional voice explaining the qualities of Venice. During the film, the audience was notably silent – the quiet and steady rhythm of the film seemed to be mirrored by the audience. As unusual as it might be to include this performance in the notes of the Biennale, it also goes to the core of FREESPACE. What is it that brings us together, what are the connections that run throughout people, places, and cities? The body in space is one of these shared elements between architecture and dance, fully justified as a starting point. Moreover, this film directly questioned the assumption that a direct and fundamental exploration of the material, the performative, and the artistic, may be seen as escaping traditional forms of academic reflection and thereby circumventing critical discourse.

All of the evening’s presentations – four pavilions, one installation in the central pavilion, and one registration of a dance performance – in fact provided space to rethink the divide between the material and the intellectual. Even with the wide range of topics – how much does a dance performance have in common with a manifesto on nation-building or the documentation of rural marketplaces? – the underlying commonalities became increasingly apparent as the evening progressed. Most projects explored (urban) spaces from more than one perspective, and highlighted both their social and their formal characteristics.

What about FREESPACE in Het Nieuwe Instituut. Photo: Maarten Nauw

After the film, Traumnovelle presented their installation for the Belgian pavilion, an EU-blue circular tribune that transformed the interior of the pavilion based on their question of how architecture can become part of a political project. Situated somewhere between utopia and a future fiction, their installation even triggered one visitor to post a dance on Instagram. The Dutch pavilion, curated by Marina Otero Verzier, was a bright orange locker room with hidden doors and cabinets showing various interpretations of the pavilion’s theme of ‘work, body, leisure’. The rigorous structure of the lockers reflects the highly regulated contemporary landscape, questioning where we can still find FREESPACE in today’s world.

In the following presentation, Jeffrey Bolhuis showed how the Irish pavilion recreated the marketplace typical of rural Irish towns. The installation will be shipped to Ireland after the Biennale and continue raising awareness on the nature and the necessity of social cohesion, here materialized in the marketplace. The Turkish curatorial team approached its pavilion as a ‘global masterclass’, inviting students and professionals to contribute to the pavilion through workshops in situ. Finally, Michelle Provoost presented Crimson Architectural Historian’s installation on The City of Comings and Goings. In various media, this installation presented the topical issue of migration in all its facets: not just refugees, but expats, temporary labor forces, different types of travelers, showing the impact on our cities of these regularly moving groups of people. The installation included an image of this fictional city in the style of Saul Steinberg, a Nolli-plan of the public spaces related to migration, and six theses on migrations (harking back to the original positions nailed to the church door by Luther).

‘nation-buildig’ and the role of architecture
Notably, a number of the questions during the discussion underlined the continuing discomfort with the issue of ‘nation-building’ and the role of architecture in relation to political and institutional structures. The discussion showed how Europe is still struggling to transcend national identities, also visible in the project ‘Europa’ by Central Office for Architecture and Urbanism. This lighthearted installation placed on the three neighboring pavilions of Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands spells out ‘Europa’ in neon letters with the colors of each nation’s flag, overwriting the names of the individual countries. In the debate, both the need for more collective action was underscored, as well as a general resistance to the very idea of nation building. One member of the audience questioned whether adding new (even if more neutral) structures such as the ‘metanation’ suggested by Traumnovelle was the answer to Europe’s identity crisis. Léone Drapeaud responded that their proposal was less about traditional ‘nation-building’ and more about a platform that emphasizes common aims and actions.

What about FREESPACE in Het Nieuwe Instituut. Photo: Maarten Nauw

a different approach to the socio-political
At the same time, alongside the pressing political concerns voiced in the debate, there is an undercurrent of social concern that cuts across political lines and national boundaries. Drawing the contributions together is an open-ended demonstration of the contemporary conditions each of these groups observe in today’s city – not documented in numbers or shown in data collections, but rather encapsulated in symbols, in materials, in spaces and even in dance. The tangible, individual experience, the subjective observation and the manner in which these objects, images and performances provoke the observer to reflect and draw their own conclusions, delineates a different approach to engaging with the socio-political sphere. It is a departure from clinical, scientific observation, yet it does not retreat into the purely individual sphere. Instead, it encourages debate, and dialogue.

Strikingly, all the contributions presented this evening were by some type of multidisciplinary, collaborative group. This seems to draw new contours for the future of the architect, replacing the mythical male genius with a network of reflective practitioners. The contributions were diverse, yet held together through shared concerns. Three pairings in the overall program show these distinct but common interests. The two pavilions most easily captured in a single image, a blue tribune (Belgium) and an orange locker room (The Netherlands), pointedly encouraged unforeseen interventions by their visitors. The two pavilions that explicitly engaged with the Biennale as a process in time (Turkey and Ireland) show how the actual building and exhibiting of architecture is but one moment in a trajectory of social and spatial configurations. And finally, the assemblage of symbolic and performative gestures that come together in the dance performance and the multiple media of the City of Comings and Goings show how the material and even ephemeral crystallization of collective ideas can have a lasting impact upon our cities and our imaginations.


Open Call Residency in Arita, Japan 2019

14 June 2018

In 2019, Creative Industries Fund NL and the Mondriaan Fund are once again jointly offering two residency periods in the Japanese ceramics region of Saga. The funds invite designers and artists to submit a proposal by 6 august 2018 at the latest.
The residency in Japan offers highly promising artists and designers the leeway to conduct artistic and technical research and to develop their personal work, which must also lead to intensive interaction with the relevant porcelain manufacturers in the region. An important guiding principle for this residency is to learn special techniques within Japan’s oldest ceramics industry and employ them in their own work.

The Dutch designer duo Scholten & Baijings and Japanese designer Teruhiro Yanagihara are involved with this celebration as artistic directors of the Arita 2016 project. They have established this residency in association with the Mondriaan Fund and Creative Industries Fund NL in order to stimulate crossovers and experimentation, as well as to initiate new collaborations between Dutch artists & designers and Japanese potteries.

Find more information about this Open Call here.

the fund